Chlorine Dioxide Controller – DioSense

The whole range of DioSense Residual Chlorine Dioxide Monitors and Controllers can be fitted with additional sensors such as chlorite or pH. Contact Pi for more details.

Chlorine is a very effective disinfectant for making and keeping drinking water safe, but when the drinking water source is surface water, containing organic materials. Chlorine dioxide is the best choice for a number of reasons:

• Chlorine dioxide is created on site, eliminating the need to store the chlorine and/or the transportation.
• Chlorine dioxide functions through an oxidative reaction rather than chlorinating reaction eliminating the development of chlorinated organic compounds which are believed to increase the risk of cancer. These are called THMs (Trihalomethanes) or DBPs (Disinfection Bi-Products).

Chlorine dioxide can be used as the main disinfectant for surface waters where there are issues with odour and taste. It acts as a successful biocide at concentrations as low as 0.1 ppm and over a wide pH range. Chlorine dioxide penetrates the cell wall of the bacteria and reacts with vital amino acids in the cytoplasm to kill the organism. The result of this reaction is chlorite. Chlorine dioxide is more widely used in industrial water treatment in applications such as food washing and hot water loops.

When handled correctly chlorine dioxide is a perfectly safe chemical to use. However, as with all disinfectant chemicals if eaten/drunk, subjected to prolonged exposure, handled improperly or absorbed through the skin the chemical can be toxic which in turn is what makes ClO₂ such an effective water disinfectant.

Chlorine dioxide is environmentally friendly and can be used as a defence against pollution towards the environment or humans from bacteria and by-products from other disinfection methods.

Solutions of approximately 1% (10g/l) ClO₂ can be stored at 5°C for several months, with little change in concentration. The solution must be stored in an airtight container with no exposure to light.

Chlorine dioxide can be made chemically from either sodium chlorite or sodium chlorate. It can also be generated electrochemically.

In comparison to chlorine, the cost of ClO₂ is higher. The cost is dependent on the cost of the original chemicals (sodium chlorite or sodium chlorate), the chemicals used to change these chemicals into chlorine dioxide, and the generation technique used. The equipment for generating chlorine dioxide is also less expensive than that of other options that can be used for water treatment. In the instances where chlorine is not the preferred monitoring or environmental choice, chlorine dioxide is the most suitable solution.

There is no difference between a chlorine dioxide monitor and a chlorine dioxide analyser. They are just two expressions used interchangeably by different people. A chlorine dioxide controller is a chlorine dioxide monitor or analyser that has on board control functionality. The Pi DioSense monitors all have such on board functionality so for a Pi DioSense there is effectively no difference between a chlorine dioxide controller, analyser and monitor.

When discussing the disinfection of water, the use of chlorine (hypochlorite) will usually be one of the first topics discussed, however, did you know that…

…Pi provides the technology for the dosing, measurement, and control of an array of other disinfectants including hydrogen peroxide, peracetic acid and chlorine dioxide?

Chlorine dioxide, rather than simply being an alternative to chlorine, can be more suitable or effective for many industries and applications. This technology review will examine the properties and uses of chlorine dioxide and the methods that are used to measure its concentration in water.

What is chlorine dioxide?

Chlorine dioxide is a compound with the formula ClO2. It appears as a yellowish-green gas and does not hydrolise in water, retaining its structure as a dissolved gas in solution. A powerful oxidiser, it was first suggested as a sterilising agent as early as 1900 but was only used on a plant scale as late as 1944.

The oxidising properties of chlorine dioxide make it useful for disinfection, and it has several advantages when compared to the more traditional chlorine. For example, it is more effective on specific pathogens such as Legionella or Giardia.

When used properly, chlorine dioxide produces less harmful by-products than chlorine, ad its disinfection ability is not influenced by pH. Its chemical properties mean that it can be cost effective because lower concentrations are needed compared to other disinfectants.

The uses of chlorine dioxide

Although, historically, chlorine dioxide has been perceived as hazardous to handle (and in concentrated and gaseous forms, it certainly can be), modern on-site generation technology allows it to be used with more confidence and safety than ever before; as a result, chlorine dioxide has found its place in numerous applications:

• Water disinfection (sewage, industrial processes, cooling towers, foodstuffs etc.)
• Bleaching wood, pulp and paper
• Biofilm removal due to its ability to penetrate the polysaccharide layers of bacterial capsules
• Oxidising soluble iron and manganese, allowing for easier removal

Just like all disinfection processes that take place at a plant scale, the need to balance proper disinfection and cost effectiveness means that accurate and reliable methods of measuring chlorine dioxide in water are needed.

Several methods have been developed for this purpose, based upon a variety of different principles. These include:

• Iodometric Titration
• Spectrophotometry
• Colourimetry
• Membrane and Non-Membrane Amperometry

Iodometric Titration

This method relies upon ClO2 oxidising iodine ions to iodine, which can then be titrated with sodium thiosulphate. Some relatively simple calculations can then be performed, and the concentration of chlorine dioxide can be deduced.

Advantages: Adjusting the pH allows the user to distinguish between Cl₂ (chlorine), ClO₂ (chlorine dioxide), ClO₂– (chlorite) and ClO₃– (chlorate). This makes the iodometric method ideal for measuring different chlorine species.
Disadvantages: Titrations can be difficult and time consuming to perform, and a higher level of technical skill is required than for other methods.

Chlorine dioxide, chlorite and hypochlorite are not easily distinguished which can cause problems in some applications.

Significant errors can arise if more than one species is present.

Although available as a test kit, the iodometric method has not been adapted for online analysis.

Spectrophotometry

This method is based upon the transmission of light. A specific wavelength of light (around 360nm in the case of chlorine dioxide) is passed through a cuvette containing the sample, and the transmission/absorption is measured.

The higher the concentration of chlorine dioxide, the lower the level of transmission; this forms the basis of the measurement.

Advantages: This method is relatively free of interferences compared to iodometric titration.
Spectrophotometers are easy to operate, and there is the potential for high accuracy.
Disadvantages: The overall accuracy is dependent on the photometer used, with higher quality models costing tens of thousands of pounds.

There is a known interference with chlorite, which can introduce significant inaccuracy.
Online spectrophotometers exist but they aren’t designed with chlorine dioxide in mind.

Colourimetric

Colourimetric analysis is based on the reaction between ClO2 and a dye, and the measurement of the absorbance of a specific wavelength of light after this reaction takes place. The dyes that can be used include N.N-diethyl-p-phenylenediamine (DPD), chlorophenol red (CPR) and Lissamine Green (LGB). Each of these dyes has its own limitations (e.g. the colour of the DPD changes over time, LGB is temperature dependent), but they also have their own positive characteristics.

Advantages: Colourimetry has higher potential accuracy than spectrophotometry when performed well. These kinds of tests are well established and are familiar to many technical and site staff.
Online colourimetry products are readily available from a variety of manufacturers.
Disadvantages: The working range of the test is limited by the concentration of the dye, which places physiochemical constraints on what is possible.

The purity of the dyes can be a problem, leading to inaccuracies; some studies report the purity of the same dye ranging from 45% to 95%.

Some dyes are not well suited to real time measurements due to longer reaction times.

Online colourimeters require a continual supply of reagents, which can be costly, and blockages in pipes can be quite common.

Membrane based amperometric sensors (available from Pi)

Designed specifically with online measurement in mind, these electrode-based sensors use a specialised electrolyte held within a membrane cap; this membrane allows ClO2 to diffuse into the electrolyte, where the following takes place at the electrodes:
• Cathode: ClO₂ + 4H⁺ + 5e- → Cl- + 2H₂O
• Anode: Cl- + Ag → AgCl + e-

The release of electrons at one electrode and the acceptance of electrons at the other creates a current flow between them, which forms the basis of the measurement.

Advantages: The membrane keeps harmful contaminants away from the electrodes, protecting them.
There is a low dependence on flow rate.
The electrolyte is pre-defined, and so the absence of chlorine dioxide gives zero current; this allows for a one-point calibration method.
No reagents or complex testing methods are required, meaning low operational costs over the lifetime of the sensor.
Continual operation makes these sensors ideal for online measurement.
Disadvantages: Surfactants and detergents can affect the membrane, allowing water to pass into the electrolyte and cause signal drift.
Water repellent substances such as mineral oils can clog the membrane pores, so chlorine dioxide cannot pass into the electrolyte causing a measurement error.
There is a known ozone interference.

Non-membrane amperometric sensors

Similar in principle to the membrane sensors, these instruments have the electrodes directly exposed to the sample water. While this leads to some disadvantages compared to membrane sensors, this allows them to be employed in certain applications that would otherwise not be possible.

Advantages: Due to the lack of membrane and electrolyte, these sensors are suitable for use in high pressure and high temperature applications.
Even lower maintenance costs are possible due to an absence of membrane caps, electrolyte and reagents.
Disadvantages: Without a microporous membrane separating them from the process stream, the electrodes are directly exposed; this makes them sensitive to interferents.
Non-membrane sensors are very sensitive to flow rate, which must be regulated well. If the flow rate changes the sensor must be recalibrated, and irregular flow can render them almost useless.

How do Process Instruments approach the measurement of chlorine dioxide?

All the approaches above have their own strengths and weaknesses and so the ‘ideal method’ depends upon the need of the end user:

As a water instrumentation and control company, Pi sees chlorine dioxide being used most in the kinds of applications that favour continual online analysis, and so the natural choice for Process Instruments is amperometric sensors.

Pi’s amperometric DioSense chlorine dioxide analysers allow for the responsive, real-time measurement of chlorine dioxide without the complex maintenance and reagents needed by online colourimetric systems. Their reagentless operation also means much lower total life costs; a large UK utility company who replaced 330 colourimetric sensors with amperometric probes saw savings of close to a million pounds over a ten year period.

Membrane based amperometric probes don’t require the strict flow control required by non-membrane systems, which can be difficult in some applications and industries. Provided some basic conditions are met (such as a lack of surfactants and detergents in the process stream), membrane based sensors are simple to install, calibrate and maintain.

You probably know that most chlorine, ozone and chlorine dioxide analysers are calibrated using hand held DPD kits but…

… did you know that DPD can’t tell you when you have no residual?
… did you know that errors on DPD performance can be up to ± 100%?
… did you know that a significant number of service calls received by Pi relate to poor calibration?

DPD (N.N-diethyl-p-phenylenediamine) is a chemical that when mixed with water containing an oxidant, changes colour depending on the concentration of the oxidant present. A handheld colourimeter measures light passing through the coloured solution. The absorption of that light by the liquid gives a concentration value. It is usually used to check concentration of, for example, free chlorine, total chlorine, ozone and chlorine dioxide etc. in water.

When the DPD kit gives a value, it is often used to calibrate online instruments……and that is where Pi comes in!

As a manufacturer of online instruments we have to understand DPD in order to help our customers when they have problems calibrating their online monitors.

This Focus On will look at:

• The limitations of DPD (turbidity, zero oxidant, bleaching, pH and interferents).
• Minimising DPD measurement error (sampling, alignment and cleaning).
• Things to look out for (low concentrations, pink colour, stained glass).
• Little known chemistry (measuring bromine, chlorite versus chlorine dioxide).
• Rinse and repeat: is it really worth repeating my measurement?

What are the limitations of DPD?

DPD cannot measure zero oxidant well.

DPD works using the absorption of light, and turbidity in the sample will give a positive reading. This means if there is no oxidant in the sample, any turbidity introduced to the sample after ‘zero’ such as undissolved tablet or powder will cause the DPD test kit to give a small reading, this is why…

DPD cannot measure below approximately 0.05 ppm.

If you suspect there is zero oxidant in your sample, hold the vial up to a white surface. If you cannot see any trace of pink colour, it is likely any reading you are getting is from the unreacted DPD tablet.

DPD cannot measure free chlorine above 6 ppm

(and won’t always give a ‘high concentration’ reading error).
Many people are unaware that past a certain level of oxidant, DPD will not form its characteristic pink colour, and instead will ‘bleach’ to form a clear solution. This can lead people to think there is little or no oxidant in their water, when in fact there is so much that it is bleaching their DPD. Be on the lookout for a flash of pink when the tablet or powder is added if you suspect your sample is being bleached. NB. special kits and reagents are available for measuring oxidant above 6 ppm.

DPD cannot measure in extremes of alkalinity or pH.

DPD tablets, powdered pillows, and drops contain buffers that will change the pH of your solution in order to facilitate DPD reacting with your oxidant. There is only so much buffering capability in the powder or tablet, and if your sample has an extreme of pH or alkalinity this could affect the concentration reading from the DPD handset.

DPD cannot distinguish between oxidants such as:

chlorine, chlorine dioxide, chlorite, ozone, organochlorides, bromine and more, meaning interferents are a big problem.

DPD is a fantastic chemical, in that it is very versatile as a colouring agent, which is how it gives the oxidant the colour that we measure. This versatility does come at a price, DPD is not very specific as an analysis tool, and so if other chemicals are present in the sample, they can interfere with the reading, giving an inaccurate result. Common interferents include chlorine dioxide (for chlorine measurement, and vice versa), sodium chlorite, ozone, organochloramines, peroxides, and many more.

DPD cannot distinguish between colour and turbidity.

Any undissolved solids, including unreacted DPD tablet, will affect the reading. Sample turbidity should be accounted for in the zero measurement. If the zero measurement has a high turbidity, this will affect the sensitivity of the colourimeter, due to the large correction it must perform to account for absorption by undissolved solids. Allowing any solids in the sample several seconds to settle after mixing is the best way to counteract this.

Minimising DPD measurement error

Here is an easy to read, printable checklist to ensure accurate DPD readings every time.

Things to look out for

When was the last time your DPD was calibrated?

Like all measurement devices, handheld DPD colourimeters can drift over time, and need to be calibrated. Check your device manual for how often it should be calibrated, if you can’t remember the last time it was calibrated, chances are it needs doing again!

Stained Glass

The pink solution formed after DPD tests can leave a residue behind on the glass, which will affect the DPD reading. This residue can be easily cleaned off using what is in your DPD kit.

Tap water

If you use normal tap water to wash out vials, droplets left behind can affect your reading due to the residual chlorine in drinking water. It is best (but not always practical) to use deionised water to wash out your vials, but if this isn’t available (deionised water can be purchased as car battery top up water from any car parts supplier) then you can use cooled boiled tap water, as boiling gets rid of any chlorine. If not then simply make sure the vials are perfectly dry before use.

Little Known Chemistry

DPD has a wide range of interferents. This means recurrent problems can sometimes be caused by the chemical makeup of the sample. For example, chlorite (ClO₂^–) and chlorine dioxide both affect DPD, but only chlorine dioxide is measured by most chlorine dioxide amperometric sensors.

DPD can be used to track bromine, but DPD No.1 tablets measure FREE chlorine or TOTAL bromine. As combined bromine is just as effective a disinfectant as free bromine, this generally doesn’t pose too much of a problem, however some amperometric sensors measure free bromine, and cannot be calibrated using DPD No.1 tablets. For more information on measuring bromine, or chlorine in seawater, please see Pi’s technical note on Seawater Chlorination.

Rinse and repeat

How important is it to repeat my DPD measurement? Isn’t it a waste of time?

A sensor is only as good as its last calibration, and the sensor will be as accurate as you calibrate it to be. If you need your sensor for tight process control, such as a pool or dosing controller, then it is essential to repeat the DPD test at least twice, if not more. The reason it’s important to repeat the test is mainly due to human error, but variation in DPD tablets has been known, or it could be a slight concentration spike that you happened to pick up in your sample. With each repetition these circumstances become less and less likely, giving you more confidence in the value you use to calibrate your analyser.

Pi recommends the following routine for calibration:

Perform a DPD test, and compare the reading to your analyser.

• Is the reading within 10% of your analyser? If yes, leave the analyser alone.
• If the reading is not within 10%, repeat the DPD test.
• Is the second test within 10% of the first test? If yes, calibrate your instrument to this reading. If not, keep repeating the DPD tests until 2 consecutive tests are within 10%, then calibrate the machine to this reading.

Many different sites ranging across the whole water industry have a daily struggle to keep instrumentation functioning correctly due to fouling. However, did you know that…

… self cleaning and self flushing systems are now available from Process Instruments for most types of sensors?
… these fouling removal systems can extend the life of sensors and drastically reduce maintenance regimes?
… Pi’s self cleaning/flushing systems are affordable, simple and trouble free by design?

What is the problem?

Sensor Fouling

Whatever the process being monitored is, there is often something in the sample water capable of fouling a sensor, and therefore causing erroneous results. The obvious solution to this problem is to clean the sensor, but how regular should inspection and cleaning programs be for each piece of instrumentation? Too regular and the inspection and cleaning regime is time consuming and unnecessarily costly. Not often enough and the instrumentation will give false results and probably fail prematurely.

What is the solution?

Process Instruments’ Autoclean and Autoflush Systems

Simple, reliable and easy to maintain, Process Instruments’ Autoclean/Autoflush systems are an alternative to mechanical cleaning mechanisms which can clog and break. By regularly spraying the sensor/probe with clean water or air, the sensor remains clean and free from fouling for extended periods of time. The sensor cleaning cycle is activated by Pi’s controller for a user selectable length of time and frequency so that no matter how dirty the application, the probe remains clean. With no moving parts in the sensor body or in the cleaning attachment there is nothing to replace or check other than a simple valve positioned in an easy to reach location.

Pi’s Autoclean and Autoflush systems can give trouble free and fouling free functioning of sensors for weeks, if not months, at a time.

A solution for each application

Autoclean

This option can be added to our pH, ORP, Turbidity, Suspended Solids and Dissolved Oxygen (DO) sensors. Consisting of an end cap to direct the flow of clean water (or air for a DO sensor) across the face of the sensor blasting any dirt away. The cleaning is controlled by a single valve positioned in an easily accessible location.

Autoverify

If using air to clean a DO sensor the system can also automatically verify that the sensor is still responding correctly, removing any need to remove the sensor from the sample for months at a time.

Autoflush

For sensors that require flow cell mounting like Chlorine, Ozone and Chlorine Dioxide, an Autoflush system has inbuilt valves which automatically start/stop the sample flow and control the flow of clean water past the probe. The user can set the flushing interval and duration to keep the flow cell and sensor clear from fouling. For particularly dirty or stubborn contaminants, warm water can be used as the flush water to aid cleaning.

With the above options, whatever the application or parameter being measured, Process Instruments will be able to provide a monitoring system that will not only be accurate, precise and long lasting but that will also remain free from fouling and save the operator both time and money.

Measuring free chlorine and chlorine dioxide independently of each other is quite a challenge, given their chemical similarities. Many sensors struggle to differentiate between the two measurands, but did you know that…

…many chlorine probes suffer from interference in the presence of chlorine dioxide?
…DPD1 will read both chlorine and chlorine dioxide?
…you can have accurate chlorine dioxide control in water where chlorine is present?

Free chlorine and chlorine dioxide are both oxidants used for disinfection in water. Each act differently as a disinfectant but are measured in almost the same way; with an electrochemical sensor or with an online DPD sensor. It is sometimes beneficial to have both disinfectants in the water at the same time, particularly when chlorine dioxide is being added to mains water.

In most non-membraned (and some membraned) amperometric sensors, oxidants are detected by a current produced at the working electrode, at a particular voltage. The same technology can effectively be ‘tuned’ to different oxidisers by varying the voltage. Lots of oxidants are measurable over a range of voltages, and sometimes those response curves overlap.

The graph shows that at almost any voltage where you can measure free chlorine, the chlorine dioxide curve overlaps with the chlorine one. This means it can be very difficult to find a probe that measures free chlorine, but doesn’t measure chlorine dioxide. Although these response curves can shift depending on probe design, electrode material and other factors, it is very difficult to engineer a response curve that gives a good signal for free chlorine but not for chlorine dioxide.

The DioSense Membraned chlorine dioxide sensor from Pi is not susceptible to interference by free chlorine. This means that the DioSense Membraned sensor can be used in conjunction with Pi’s HaloSense free chlorine sensor, to measure chlorine dioxide and free chlorine independently of each other in the same application, on Pi’s CRONOS® or CRIUS® analyser. The analyser takes the signal from the free chlorine probe, which does have a known interference from chlorine dioxide (1ppm of chlorine dioxide will show up as 0.75ppm of chlorine). The normalised signal from the chlorine dioxide sensor can then be removed.